Okay, I understand that, I completely understand that, and I, too, am bothered by women who define their identity by one aspect of it, such as "bisexual!" or "lesbian!" or "vegan!" That, I get. But - and it's probable that she just did not express herself well at ALL - I can't accept her presenting some women as "those types of women" with no back-up or evidence, and I am not going to take HER word for it that they are empty and not worth knowing. You know?